Hi there
Why does ANUMN produce two different results from an explicit 100% transfer versus an implicit 100% transfer?
I have executed two asset transfers using ABUMN, one using 100% in the "Partial Transfer" tab, and another with nothing in the "Partial Transfers" tab.
These assets had been impaired (unplanned depreciation), the impairment reversed and an revaluation applied. It seemed that the impairment was transferred (even though reversed) if 100% was explicitly specified?
Any ideas?
Regards
Joe